2026 B2C industry research

The Broken Funnel Report

How AI has transformed the B2C buying journey, and the data needed to shape your 2027 AI agent roadmap

Respondents
451 B2C marketing leaders
Role
60% director or higher
Industries
Automotive, healthcare/dental, home services, financial services/insurance, telecom
Company size
100+ employees
Introduction

Trouble lurks beneath the surface

At first glance, the state of the buyer journey for B2C brands is reassuring. Most marketing leaders report modest growth in website traffic, which is surprising given all the doom and gloom we’ve heard about this lately. A majority say that they can attribute leads to AI search and generative AI platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. And 44% have rolled out conversational AI agents, with another 27% piloting. Trouble lurks beneath the surface, though, especially when it comes to connecting the full buyer journey to revenue.

Nearly three-quarters of respondents cannot follow a lead from the first digital interaction through to a sale, 73% judge AI agent performance on factors other than revenue or booked outcomes, and 56% lose sight of a lead entirely the moment it reaches a dealer, franchise, or local branch. AI agents are also creating new visibility gaps in the buyer journey, as only 19% of those with agents can reliably send conversion signals from AI agents to their ad platforms.

Whether you're a CMO looking to maximize digital marketing ROI, a digital marketer working to improve conversion rates, or a CX professional building customer experiences for the AI age, this data will help guide your AI strategy in the coming year.

At a glance

Research highlights

60%
Report website traffic growth
44%
Have conversational AI agents live
73%
Judge AI agent performance on factors other than revenue
19%
Can reliably send AI agent conversion data to ad platforms
Section 01

AI search hasn’t killed B2C website traffic, but it has moved the digital front door

Consumer brands are not experiencing the apocalyptic drops in traffic that are dominating headlines in the B2B and publishing worlds. Compared to 12 months ago, 60% report gains in website traffic, though over a third report modest growth of 9% or less, and 37% report it’s flat or declining. Nearly half attribute fluctuations in traffic to AI answer engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. No surprise there.

Change in website traffic vs. prior 12 months
Up 1–9%33%
Up 10% or more27%
About flat12%
Down 10–24%8%
Down 1–9%7%
Down 25–49%7%
Down 50% or more3%
Up · 60%FlatDownNot sure · 3%
48%
Say AI answer engines have had the biggest effect on website traffic in the last year

The best leads are coming from AI answer engines

As we previously reported in the Invoca Lead Benchmark Report, the most qualified leads are now coming from AI answer engines like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. It’s still a narrow margin, but the qualitative responses also show that AI is delivering buyers who are more informed and closer to making a purchase decision. This also suggests they are relying on AI to find answers about your brand rather than on your website.

Consumers now often arrive with more specific questions after using AI tools for research, and they also expect websites to give quick, clear answers while making it easy to book an appointment or request a quote.

Marketing manager, home services, 100–499 employees

Which entry points produce your most qualified leads
AI answer engines44%
Google Local Services Ads40%
Organic search39%
Paid social37%
Paid search36%
Google Business Profile36%
Section 02

As AI agent adoption ramps up, the shortcomings reveal themselves

Conversational AI agents are becoming commonplace for B2C brands. Over 70% of marketers report that they’re piloting AI agents or have them live and in front of customers. There’s still plenty of room for growth, however, as 28% are either still evaluating AI agents or have no plans to implement them.

Where brands are with AI agent implementation
Live in at least one channel44%
Piloting or in limited testing27%
Evaluating, but nothing running yet23%
No current plans5%
Not sure1%
Survey noteWe specified that “AI agents” must be customer-facing and capable of holding a 2-way conversation via phone, website chat, or text message. Voice response IVR or phone tree menus, notification, promotion, or nurture messages, tools teams use internally, and chatbots that only serve canned answers do not count.

ChatGPT has made consumers expect faster, more direct answers. They often use AI to research and compare information before visiting our website. They want our website to be clear, helpful, and easy to navigate.

Marketing manager, financial services, 5,000 or more employees

Most marketers don’t measure AI agent success on revenue outcomes

Only a small share of marketers measure their AI agents on revenue outcomes. About seven in ten use a KPI other than revenue or booked outcomes and describe that as performance.

Outcomes used to determine AI agent performance
27%
73%
Revenue or booked outcome
Other KPI
Revenue or booked outcome
Conversion rate on agent conversations11%
Appointments or consultations booked9%
Revenue attributed to agent conversations7%
Other KPI
Customer satisfaction score20%
Qualified leads produced16%
Volume of conversations handled16%
Share of conversations handled without a person10%
Cost per contact or cost to serve10%
We don't measure it formally1%

The missing link: AI agents are disconnected from the buyer journey

AI agents should ostensibly contribute to the bottom line, but most marketers are not measuring their success against revenue-related metrics. The data shows this may be because they can’t. Only 19% of marketers surveyed said they can connect complete conversion data from their AI agents to their ad platforms, and only 26% can confidently track leads handled by AI agents from click to conversion.

This disconnect also impacts the buyer experience and conversion rates. Fewer than a third of marketers said their AI agents can use a lead’s digital journey data prior to the engagement. Without that data, agents start every conversation from scratch, frustrating potential customers by making them feel like they’re repeating themselves and being forced to use AI instead of talking to a person.

74%
Cannot track leads from click to conversion that are handled by AI agents
27%

Agent can see the customer's digital journey and use it

26%

Conversations tied back to the campaign, keyword, or ad

19%

Outcomes can be returned to ad platforms as conversion signals

The AI would need to be perfectly integrated with our real-time CRM and inventory data. More importantly, it must have a flawless handoff system that instantly routes a high-intent buyer to a live human representative the moment the conversation gets complex.

Marketing manager, healthcare, 1,000–4,999 employees

Section 03

Most marketers can spot AI-driven leads, but lose them further down the funnel

Reassuringly, most marketers report they can attribute leads to AI answer engines like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. There is still evidence that AI is complicating tracking and changing how consumers interact with their websites, though.

Can you tell whether a lead started their research in an AI answer engine?
86% answered yes
46%Yes, for most
40%Yes, for some
9%No5%Not sure
86%
Say they can usually identify a lead that began in an AI answer engine

Attribution breaks down when leads leave marketing’s hands

The clear view of attribution breaks down at the most important part of the buyer journey. Over half of marketers (56%) say they can’t track what happens to a lead once it’s routed to a dealer, franchise, or local branch, and only 21% can both see and influence leads through conversion.

It has made consumer behavior much harder to track using traditional analytics, as many users gather information about our brand entirely inside the AI interface before ever visiting.

Marketing manager, healthcare, 1,000–4,999 employees

Where leads lose attribution
Share of marketers who lose attribution, by lead destination
Lead destinationLose attribution
Business locations, franchises, dealers, etc.
56%
Text or chat
46%
Phone call
40%

A staggering 74% cannot fully track leads from the first click through to conversion. This makes revenue attribution, ROAS calculation, and conversion data-driven ad optimization inaccurate at best and, realistically, impossible.

One home services marketing executive said that to fully trust an AI agent with a revenue conversation, it would have to “provide granular, turn-by-turn analytics so I can see exactly why a revenue conversation succeeded or failed…” However, the data shows their agentic AI platforms are not capable of connecting the buyer journey from click to conversion.

Section 04

Are marketers overestimating their speed-to-lead?

When we surveyed consumers earlier this year about how quickly brands respond after someone submits a lead form, the data showed they were clearly falling short of expectations. 56% of consumers said they expected a response within an hour, but only 36% actually received one within that window.

Responding to a lead form within one hour
What marketers report vs. what consumers experience
Marketers
Say they respond to lead form submissions within 1 hour
84%
Consumers
Expect a response within an hour
56%
Consumers
Say they got a response within 1 hour
36%

Consumer data: Invoca B2C Buyer Experience Report, 2026

When we posed the same question to marketers in this survey, 84% said they respond to lead form inquiries within an hour. That’s a massive disparity that is difficult to reconcile or dismiss as self-reporting bias. It’s important to note that in our previous consumer survey, we found that 20% expect a response within 5 minutes, and 79% choose the brand that responds fastest. So even if you call a lead back in an hour, that may not be fast enough.

Survey noteIn the question, we specified that the “response” to the lead form must be a conversation, whether with a human agent or an AI agent capable of two-way communication. Auto-replies, one-way text messages, and confirmation emails do not count.

Brands lose a significant number of leads—and revenue—to slow response times and unanswered calls

Whether or not brands are actually responding to leads within an hour of contact, they concede that they are losing significant lead volume to slow responses and unanswered calls. 1 in 4 marketers (25%) say they lose 20% or more of inbound leads due to slow response times and unanswered calls. That is a significant revenue leak.

Share of inbound leads lost to slow response or unanswered calls
Respondents reporting each range
18%
24%
31%
16%
7%
2%
Under 5%5–9%10–19%20–29%30–49%50%+
Section 05

What AI agent capabilities do marketers really want?

Marketers want AI agents that are connected to the full buyer journey. Ask marketers what would make their AI agents more useful, and the top two answers both depend on what the agent knows before the conversation starts. Over 40% ranked "tailoring the conversation to the consumer's digital journey" among their top three improvements. Another 41% chose "recognizing a returning consumer and having their history.” Evidence from across the survey suggests that agents disconnected from buyer journey data are causing significant reporting headaches and revenue leakage.

Which of these would make your AI agents more useful? (Top five)
Tailoring the conversation to the consumer's digital journey43%
Recognizing a returning consumer and having their history41%
Qualifying leads or determining serviceability39%
Automating appointment scheduling39%
Warm-transferring a sales lead with full context39%
Depends on buyer journey data

A great agent recognizes where someone is in the buying journey, provides immediate answers, and hands off the full history to a rep when needed. Bad agents operate like dead-end IVRs that annoy high-intent buyers.

C-level or SVP in marketing, healthcare, 1,000–4,999 employees

Learn how the Invoca Data + AI Platform powers better experiences and outcomes

Invoca connects every online and offline touchpoint, and every AI agent conversation, in your buyer journey to revenue. Learn how marketing, ecommerce, and contact centers use Invoca’s Data + AI Platform to optimize demand and convert more leads to appointments and sales.

Schedule a demo
Methodology

Survey methodology

Gather fielded a 20-question guided interview with US marketing leaders between 14 September and 5 October 2026. Respondents qualified at manager level or above, at companies with 100 or more employees. Respondents work in automotive, healthcare (including dental), home services, financial services (including insurance), or telecom. They have direct or shared responsibility for lead conversion, paid media performance, customer engagement channels, or website and demand generation.

Responses received
505
Responses after quality screening
451
Field dates
9/14/26–10/5/26
Margin of error, clean sample, 95% confidence
±4.6 pts
Geography
United States
Respondent industries
Home services30%
Healthcare, including dental28%
Financial services, including insurance25%
Automotive11%
Telecom6%
Company size
100–499 employees32%
500–999 employees25%
1,000–4,999 employees27%
5,000 or more employees16%
Quality screening

Responses removed before analysis

54 of 505 received
451 retained54 removed
Notes on calculationPercentages are calculated from unique respondents rather than mentions, and single-select questions use largest-remainder rounding so that the distributions sum to exactly 100. Questions asked only of respondents running or piloting an agent carry a base of 323 and are labeled accordingly. Ranking questions report the share of respondents placing an option in their top three, so those values exceed 100% by design.